In the vibrant world of YouTube, where creators engage audiences with diverse content, the name Sameer MD has recently sparked heated debate in Karnataka, India.
Sameer MD. Known for his bold and investigative videos, Sameer MD has become a polarizing figure, especially for his reporting on sensitive local issues. His YouTube channel, Dhoota, has garnered millions of views, but with popularity comes scrutiny, including legal battles and public backlash.
Based in Karnataka, India, Sameer MD is a Kannada YouTuber who goes by the name Dhoota (meaning “messenger” in Kannada) on YouTube. His content focuses primarily on investigative storytelling and often tackles controversial debates and sensitive topics.
He has gained significant traction, particularly for his in-depth videos on the 2012 Sujanya rape and murder case in Dharmasthala. With a knack for storytelling, Sameer MD combines artificial intelligence-generated visuals, detailed narration, and bold claims to engage his audience, which has led to widespread popularity and legal challenges.
The Controversies Surrounding on Sameer MD
Saujanya Case: Igniting a Firestorm
01. The most significant controversy surrounding Sameer MD was the 38-minute video uploaded on February 27, 2025, titled Dharmasthala Saujanya Case.
Revisits the unsolved 2012 rape and murder of 17-year-old Saujanya, a student of Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College in Ujire, Karnataka.
The video, which has garnered nearly 19 million views, alleges that influential figures, including the nephew of Dr. Veerendra Heggade, the dean of Sri Kshetra Dharmasthala temple, were involved in the crime and controlled criminal activities in the temple town of Heggade.
Sameer MD used AI-generated graphics and compelling narrative to highlight investigative lapses and suggest cover-ups, reviving the case that had remained unsolved for over a decade into public interest.
02. In March 2025, a Bengaluru court ordered Sameer MD to remove a video related to the Courtesy Case against Dr. Veerendra Heggade, the administrator of the Sri Kshetra Dharmasthala temple, citing defamation.
Despite the injunction, Sameer MD was accused of uploading another video on the same subject.
This led to a Rs 10 crore defamation case being filed by temple representatives D. Harshendra Kumar and Nischal D. in April 2025. The court directed them to delete the video and appear before it, highlighting the legal limitations of online commentary.
The case highlights the fine line that YouTubers tread when discussing sensitive topics. Despite the court order, Sameer MD’s decision to revisit the Courtesy Case has raised questions about freedom of speech and responsible content creation.
03. “Dharmasthala Serial Killers” Video
On July 11, 2025, Dharmasthala police will file a case against Sameer MD for a video titled Dharmasthala Serial Killers with the intention to provoke public sentiment.
The video is alleged to contain content created by artificial intelligence with artificial details about serial murders that are said to have taken place in Dharmasthala.
The police have registered a case under Section 39/2025, initiating two separate investigations into the spread of false information.
The incident has further fueled debates on the ethics of using AI in content creation and the responsibility of influencers to verify information before sharing it with millions of people.
Karnataka High Court and religious sentiments on Sameer MD
In March 2025, the Bellary police registered a suo motu case against Sameer MD under Section 299 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), alleging that he had hurt religious sentiments through his video of a courtesy call.
In the complaint filed by Kaul Bazaar Sub-Inspector M. Ningappa, Sameer MD was alleged to have indirectly implicated Dr. Heggade and his family in multiple murders, which hurt the sentiments of devotees of Dharmasthala. The use of the word “Gowda” in the video to refer to the Heggade family was considered an indirect attack.
Sameer MD’s legal team argued that there was no direct insult to any religion in the video and that it was based on publicly available information.
The Karnataka High Court, in several judgments, granted interim relief, first staying the police notice on March 6, 2025 due to procedural irregularities (non-provision of FIR copy) and then staying the criminal proceedings till March 19, 2025.
These judgments, delivered by Justices M. Nagaprasanna and Hemanth Chandanagouder, emphasized legal protection for Sameer MD but did not resolve the wider debate on his issue.
Why Sameer MD Matters to His Audience
For many viewers, Sameer MD represents a voice that dares to question the status quo. His focus on unresolved cases like Sowjanya’s resonates with those frustrated by perceived injustices or lack of closure. His use of AI visuals and detailed storytelling makes complex issues accessible, drawing in viewers who might not engage with traditional news outlets.
However, his controversies raise critical questions: How far can creators go in their pursuit of truth? What are the consequences of crossing legal or ethical lines? For fans of Sameer MD, his content offers a platform to discuss issues often swept under the rug, but it also serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of unverified claims.
for updates on Karnataka news and legal developments. join our telegram channel
detailed coverage of court cases, including Sameer MD’s legal battles. click here
